<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Find50-Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk</link>
	<description>emarketing, SEO, SEM, Google AdWords, Google Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:53:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Even Google misses negatives in AdWords sometimes</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/08/even-google-misses-negatives-inadwords-sometimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/08/even-google-misses-negatives-inadwords-sometimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding negative Keywords can really help your performance in AdWords. Doing a search for `university places` on google.co.uk as expected throws up some ads for Uni places. However my eye was caught by the one advertiser, Google, who is promoting a different kind of `places` in this case an ad for Google Local Listing. Clearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding negative Keywords can really help your performance in AdWords. Doing a search for `university places` on google.co.uk as expected throws up some ads for Uni places. However my eye was caught by the one advertiser, Google, who is promoting a different kind of `places` in this case an ad for Google Local Listing. Clearly someone has put a keyword(s) on Broad Match and has not been regularly checking the search terms that it actually triggers on. For occasional users of AdWords the idea and practice of using negatives can be difficult to grasp. This is a pretty good example where the use of a negative keyword ie `university`would dramatically lower the number of unwanted impressions resulting in a better CTR and probably lower CPC.  Mind you this is likely not a real cost for whoever placed this ad.</p>
<div id="attachment_698" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 829px"><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/UseNegativeswith-Google-AdWords.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-698 " title="UseNegativeswith Google AdWords" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/UseNegativeswith-Google-AdWords-1024x261.jpg" alt="Need to use negative keywords to stop incorrect ad impressions" width="819" height="209" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Places ad showing in the wrong place CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE</p></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/08/even-google-misses-negatives-inadwords-sometimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>reducing your Google rankings ?</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/07/reducing-your-google-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/07/reducing-your-google-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster_tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently the UK government announced that over 1000 government web sites have been closed and another 615 are scheduled to close. A lot of these sites had a close relationship with the charity sector and no doubt had backlinks to various charity sector sites. It is unlikely that any of the closed sites sites have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently the UK government announced that over 1000 government web sites have been closed and another 615 are scheduled to close. A lot of these sites had a close relationship with the charity sector and no doubt had backlinks to various charity sector sites. It is unlikely that any of the closed sites sites have any permanent redirects (301`s) in place. This means that anyone who visits them will get a `Site Not Found ` message. At best visitors will be redirected to another government web site. Either way all the referral traffic (see Google Analytics &gt; <em>Traffic Sources</em> &gt; <em>Referring Sites</em> ) and the google ranking that they passed to your site via these links will be lost. This will have a real impact on traffic to many charity sites as Google gives great weight to .gov links when deciding who to rank for a particular search query.</p>
<p>What to do ?  Go to your Webmaster Tools account and look in <em>Your site on the web</em> &gt; <em>Links to your site</em>. Download these links to Excel and find the ones with .gov extensions. Then very politely contact the organisation and ask them to put a 301 redirect on the pages that you appeared on. Then find the new government site ( or indeed any government site) that deals with your charity or condition and ask them for a backlink to you site.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/07/reducing-your-google-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>benchmarks for UK charity web sites</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/06/useful-charity-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/06/useful-charity-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charities and nfp`s looking for benchmark data on their web site performance will find the the recently released report on 46 government sites useful. The data is for 2009/10 and covers 46 sites with total monthly visits of 32 Million and a total cost of £127M. For each site there is a breakdown of Cost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_634" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 431px"><a title="COI Web Site Report" href="http://coi.gov.uk/aboutcoi.php?page=357" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-634" title="Useful web site comparison for charities ?" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/COI.jpg" alt="Charity web site performance comparison data" width="421" height="122" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">UK Government COI report </p></div>
<p>Charities and nfp`s looking for benchmark data on their web site performance will find the the recently released report on 46 government sites useful. The data is for 2009/10 and covers 46 sites with total monthly visits of 32 Million and a total cost of £127M. For each site there is a breakdown of Cost and Usage. Across the 46 sites the overall cost per visit is £ 0.22 with a Bounce Rate of 37.5%. The Average Time on Site is around 4/6 minutes (although this excludes all Bounce visits) and average monthly Unique visits per site of 690k each month. As with all data real care needs to be taken in any comparison. To get a more accurate picture I picked 10 sites where the costs are detailed and the sites have a mid range value of monthly visitors. For these 10 sites the average cost per visit was £0.07 over a total of 52M annual visits. <a title="COI Web Site Report" href="http://coi.gov.uk/aboutcoi.php?page=357" target="_blank">This data</a> is particularly useful as it is from government web sites. These more closely resemble the function and purpose of charity sites rather than commercial sites where most data comes from.</p>
<p>Picking one or two sites from the list that have Costs or Visits similar to yours and comparing their data to your site could be useful. For the most accurate comparison charity sites should I reckon omit data relating directly to Fundraising traffic as this differs greatly from cause related traffic and is not comparable to the data from these government sites.</p>
<p><a title="Web Standards and Guidelines COI" href="http://coi.gov.uk/guidance.php?page=188" target="_blank">The methodology used </a>to gather the data is clearly laid out and could be a useful basis for doing an evaluation of your site. In addition there is a lot of good advice in the COI site section Measuring Web Site Quality. The section <a title="Delivering Web Site Objectives" href="http://coi.gov.uk/guidance.php?page=141" target="_blank">Delivering Web site objectives</a> is useful in pointing the way towards more detailed measurable achievements giving examples such as 1. Reduced calls due to better site info 2. registrations for events and services 3.  measurable user participation, etc. Mind you the COI site itself could do with seo friendly urls. Better advice about getting your web site seen by search engines would be useful too.</p>
<p>Demonstrating that a web site is worth the investment is not easy but hard data is the best way to do it. Showing that your site compares well using this data and that it compares well to its peers using the info provided by Google in GA will help. Proving that you can reach more people AND lower costs elsewhere are pretty powerful arguments as budgets come under scrutiny.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/06/useful-charity-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Insight for charities and nfp`s</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/06/google-insight-for-charities-and-nfps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/06/google-insight-for-charities-and-nfps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Insights for Search is useful for identifying new search trends and potential keywords for charity adwords or seo.  It is particularly useful in finding new or rising search trends. AnnMarie Hill of the Google Grants Team has recently written about it. A couple of examples show how it can be used. First, for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Insights for Search is useful for identifying new search trends and potential keywords for charity adwords or seo.  It is particularly useful in finding new or rising search trends.<a class="wp-caption" title="Google Insight nfp article" href="http://googlegrants.blogspot.com/2010/06/how-can-non-profit-benefit-from.html" target="_blank"> AnnMarie Hill of the Google Grants Team</a> has recently written about it. A couple of examples show how it can be used.</p>
<div id="attachment_544" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 619px"><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Volunteer1A.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-544     " title="Google Insight - charity search terms." src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Volunteer1A.jpg" alt="Google Insight - comparison of charity terms" width="609" height="348" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparing two search terms.  CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE</p></div>
<p>First, for the <strong>United Kingdom</strong> only we can compare how frequently in <strong>Web Search</strong> the terms ` volunteer` and `volunteering` were used over the <strong>Last 12 months</strong>. We can quickly see that the search term `volunteer` is almost twice as popular as `volunteering` and that January is the most popular time for searches. More data about the nature of these searches can be got by examining the searches in each Category ( shown in the red box). Note that data from the filter `<strong>All sub-regions</strong>` for the UK has very questionable accuracy and should not be used without data from other sources.</p>
<p>We can now look in more detail and see what the Top Searches associated with `volunteer` were.</p>
<div id="attachment_568" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 636px"><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Volunteer2A.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-568  " title="Google Insight -charity search terms increasing in popularity ." src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Volunteer2A.jpg" alt="Google Insight for charities - rising searches" width="626" height="131" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Insight rising searches CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE</p></div>
<p><strong>Rising Searches</strong> (shown on the right of the image above)  is particularly interesting as it shows that searches for `vodafone volunteer` is classed as <strong>Breakout </strong>which means that searches have risen by more than 5000% ! `festival volunteer ` and ` volunteer week` have also been increasing in popularity over the last 90 days.</p>
<p>Exploring <strong>All Categories</strong> can be useful. For charities and nfp`s in particular the Categories: Lifestyles, Society and Health give interesting insight into what searchers are looking for.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/06/google-insight-for-charities-and-nfps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdWords Quality Score &#8211; get more clicks for less money</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/05/adwords-quality-score-get-more-clicks-for-less-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/05/adwords-quality-score-get-more-clicks-for-less-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you have a Grant or regular AdWords account Google has provided a clear way to improve the results you get from your AdWords spend. Quality Score (QS) has been specifically designed by Google to encourage ads more relevant to the searcher and potentially cheaper for the advertiser. Improve your QS and get more clicks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you have a Grant or regular AdWords account Google has provided a clear way to improve the results you get from your AdWords spend. Quality Score (QS) has been specifically designed by Google to encourage ads more relevant to the searcher and potentially cheaper for the advertiser. Improve your QS and get more clicks for less money.</p>
<div id="attachment_496" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/QualityScore.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-496   " style="border: 2px solid black;" title="QualityScore" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/QualityScore.jpg" alt="AdWords Quality Score" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">possible Quality Scores ?</p></div>
<p>The cost per click (cpc) that the advertiser pays for a keyword is directly related to its QS. <a title="Quality Score factors" href="http://www.clickequations.com/blog/2009/03/the-economics-of-quality-score/">Craig Danuloff</a> has crunched a lot of numbers to show the effect of QS on the cpc. Briefly, a QS of 7 means that you are paying the standard price for each click. For a QS below 7 you are penalised eg a QS of 4 means you will be charged a 75% Premium. However a Quality Score of 1.0 means that you get a discount of 30%. So what are the factors that Google takes into account when calculating the Quality Score for each Keyword/Ad combination. For the Search Network <a title="Quality Score Factors" href="http://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=10215">Google lists 8 factors</a>. However the most significant is the Click Through Rate or CTR &#8211; specifically the CTR for the Exact Match version of the keyword.  <a title="CTR and Quality Score" href="http://searchengineland.com/how-important-is-click-through-rate-in-googles-quality-score-formula-27296">Siddharth Shah </a>has crunched some different numbers and his show the correlation between CTR and Quality Score. The higher the CTR the higher the QS. So, a keyword CTR in the range of 2 or 3% will get you a QS of 7 but you will need a *much* higher CTR to get the magic of QS 8, 9 or 10 discounts. Looking at my own keywords with a QS of 10 ( not as many as I would like sadly )  all of them have an Exact Match CTR of over 30%. So no surprise, Google does not easily give away AdWords discounts. Typically you will only get that kind of CTR on very specialise keywords or Brand Terms.</p>
<p>One way to improve your CTR for a keyword is to lower the number of Impressions that do not receive a click. Identifying possible Negative keywords that will help you is an ongoing task that pays dividends. One way to find search terms that on Broad Match trigger your ad is to look in the Search Query Report. For some accounts this now shows Impressions that get no Clicks. Another way to is to enter the keyword as a search term and then check the terms shown in Google Suggest. Also some terms shown in Related Searches under More Search tools can give suitable negatives.</p>
<p>Note that Google makes public a linear QS scale of 1 to 10. However it is almost certain than internally they use a log scale such as the one used for Page Rank where one number is vastly greater than the previous one eg 2 is 100 times greater than 1 and so on. This means QS will in reality cover a very wide range. So when you reach the magic 7 keep improving the CTR as it is very likely that Google has a more refined internal scale and even though you cannot get above 7 your ad position and cpc may will continue to improve.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/05/adwords-quality-score-get-more-clicks-for-less-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webmaster Tools Search Query data and ranking</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/04/webmaster-tools-search-query-data-and-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/04/webmaster-tools-search-query-data-and-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster_tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google have again updated the search query data that they are providing in Webmaster Tools. The data can be found in WMT under the tab `Your Site on the Web`&#62; `Top Search Queries`. ( The posting below titled `Webmaster Tools data for Marketing` gives more info on WMT layout) . This update shows many more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NewWMT1.jpg"> </a>Google have again updated the <a title="Search Query Data" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/more-data-and-charts-in-top-search.html" target="_blank">search query data</a> that they are providing in Webmaster Tools. The data can be found in WMT under the tab `Your Site on the Web`&gt; `Top Search Queries`. ( The posting below titled `Webmaster Tools data for Marketing` gives more info on WMT layout) . This update shows many more Search Queries ( 3/7,000 in some of my accounts) with a Google Analytics style graph, a Search Box to find a specific Query term plus date menus to isolate data for a specific period. eg  How did we rank do for a specific keyword/phrase for that race/event/cause last week or month ? However the most interesting thing, which is only briefly mentioned in the Google blog posting, is the `% Clickthrough` column. Some bloggers have mentioned that Google is looking to add more weight in the search results algorithm to those pages that are popular with users. This would be consistent with the approach used in Google AdWords where a discount in applied to the cost of each Click for those keywords that have a high Quality Score and hence CTR. ( It is worth noting that the Impression and Click data shown in WMT do not match the data you will find in your Google Analytics account. My analysis shows that the number of clicks shown in GA is consistently higher than the WMT by around 20 %. )</p>
<p><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NewWMT1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-472" title="NewWMT" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/NewWMT1.jpg" alt="% organic CRT shown in Webmaster Tools" width="432" height="164" /> </a>So what to do: 1. Look at the list of Queries and see if there are any that you would like a page on your site to rank higher for.  If you see a suitable Query with a high number of Impressions take a closer look. If your highest ranked page for that term is below Position 1 or 2,  and consequently getting few Clicks, you should look to optimise that page for this Query. To do that look at on-page factors, particularly the Page Title, then look to get back links, ideally from external sites, with the Query as the anchor text.</p>
<p>2.  Check the snippet which appears in the Google SERPS results for the top terms that you want to be found for.  Does the snippet  ( and the Page Title) accurately describe what you are offering and if so does it encourage visitors to your page ?</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/04/webmaster-tools-search-query-data-and-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effect of social networking on UK charity web site traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/03/effect-of-social-networking-on-uk-charity-web-site-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/03/effect-of-social-networking-on-uk-charity-web-site-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than .5% of web site traffic was driven by social networking sites based on analysis of 6 UK charity web sites for the period 1st Oct 2009 to 28th Feb 2010. The sites examined had monthly Visits between 20k and 800k. Social Sites such as Facebook and Twitter are now major sources of traffic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than .5% of web site traffic was driven by social networking sites based on analysis of 6 UK charity web sites for the period 1st Oct 2009 to 28th Feb 2010. The sites examined had monthly Visits between 20k and 800k.</p>
<div id="attachment_437" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 435px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-437" title="SocialSitesMontage" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SocialSitesPic-300x126.jpg" alt="Most popular Social Sites" width="425" height="152" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Most popular Social Sites</p></div>
<p>Social Sites such as Facebook and Twitter are now major sources of traffic for many web sites and for some web sites rival Google in their ability to drive traffic.</p>
<p>However for these UK charities the social  networking sites are not big drivers of traffic. The analysis showed that Facebook and Twitter accounted for over 95% of visits from the social sites, although Stumbleupon had some success. While the data says that Twitter brought about 33% of the visits that Facebook brought in reality Twitter probably brought more as many believe that <a title="GA undercounts Twitter" href="http://searchengineland.com/is-twitter-sending-you-500-to-1600-more-traffic-than-you-might-think-22696" target="_blank">Google Analytics undercounts Twitter visits</a> by a factor of 5 or more.<br />
Social Networking sites have an important role to play in reaching specific audiences but for now it is best to tag each tweet and check the stats for the specific landing page to really measure the impact on visits.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/03/effect-of-social-networking-on-uk-charity-web-site-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get more from google AdWords with Ad Sitelinks</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/03/get-more-from-google-adwords-with-ad-sitelinks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/03/get-more-from-google-adwords-with-ad-sitelinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in November Google introduced Ad Sitelinks which allows you to put 4 additional links to your site into your adwords ad. Ad  Sitelinks give you more screen real estate in a prime location and early indications are that it results in more clicks. However to take advantage of it you need to have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in November Google introduced <a title="Ad Sitelinks" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/11/increasing-choice-and-relevancy-in.html" target="_blank">Ad Sitelinks</a> which allows you to put 4 additional links to your site into your adwords ad.</p>
<div id="attachment_400" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 652px"><img class="size-full wp-image-400" title="RNIBAdSiteLinks" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RNIBAdSiteLinks.jpg" alt="RNIB Google AdWords Sitelinks " width="642" height="242" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Google RNIB AdWords Sitelinks </p></div>
<p>Ad  Sitelinks give you more screen real estate in a prime location and early indications are that it results in more clicks. However to take advantage of it you need to have a good AdWords Account CTR. My experience is that you need a CTR of around 3% spread across all your ad Campaigns to be offered the Ad Sitelinks option. You can check if you qualify by logging onto your adwords account, go to Campaign &gt; Settings &gt; Networks, device and extensions. Here, if eligible, you can enter a brief description and the associated url for the appropriate pages on your site.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<div id="attachment_411" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-411" title="AdWordsCampaignSettingsNetworks" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/AdWordsCampaignSettingsNetworks-300x266.jpg" alt="Location of Ad Sitelinks settings in AdWords" width="300" height="266" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Location of Ad Sitelinks settings in AdWords</p></div>
</div>
<p>Google deals with the question `<a title="What Ads can have site links" href="https://adwords.google.com/support/aw/bin/answer.py?hl=en_GB&amp;answer=164779" target="_blank">What ads qualify</a> ? and they specifically say &#8221; Ad Sitelinks are most likely to trigger on unique brand terms&#8221;. My experience has been that this is the case on all accounts that I have done this for.</p>
<p>Now on your main brand term you can occupy a large amount of google SERPS screen real estate &#8211; your AdSitelinks, regular site links and (in many cases) a site specific Search Box plus Local Listings. Anyone looking for you under your brand term should be able to find you.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/03/get-more-from-google-adwords-with-ad-sitelinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take care with GA Direct Traffic and Bounce Rate accuracy</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/01/take-care-with-ga-direct-traffic-and-bounce-rate-accuracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/01/take-care-with-ga-direct-traffic-and-bounce-rate-accuracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two keys metrics in Google Analytics that are very widely used, particularly by occasional users, are Traffic Sources and Bounce Rate. Both are useful for example when applied to individual pages but they need to be used with an understanding of their limitations. Direct Traffic is defined as &#8221; people who clicked a bookmark to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two keys metrics in Google Analytics that are very widely used, particularly by occasional users, are Traffic Sources and Bounce Rate. Both are useful for example when applied to individual pages but they need to be used with an understanding of their limitations. <a title="Direct Traffic definition" href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=60126" target="_blank">Direct Traffic is defined</a> as &#8221; people who clicked a bookmark to come to your site or typed your site URL into their browser &#8220;.  While that is true Direct Traffic can also include any visitor that the system can not identify the source of. Examples would be visitors who came from a 301 redirect, from a Campaign eg banner, email where the campaign links were  not appended or from a visitor who is using the <a title="Private Browsing" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_browsing" target="_blank">Private Browsing </a>feature of Explorer 8.  In order to ensure that the correct marketing channel gets credit for bringing visitors Google Analytics stores for 6 months the Traffic Source the visitor first came from ( in the _utmz cookie). So if a visitor finds a page using Organic search ALL visits subsequently made by this visitor ( actually all visits made from the same browser on the same machine ), EVEN if she comes from a bookmark that she made after her first visit, will register as coming from Organic.</p>
<p><a title="Bounce Rate" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_rate" target="_blank">Bounce Rate is defined </a>as  &#8221; &#8230;the number of visitors who enter the site at a page and leave within the specified timeout period without viewing another page, divided by the total number of visitors who entered the site at that page &#8220;. So it does not take into account the number of Page Views by Visitors who did not land on that page. For example a page may have 5 direct visits and 4 leave immediately ie a Bounce Rate of 80%. However that page may also have 200 Page Views from other visitors to the site. The average time on page may be long. That piece of data gives a very different `spin` on  how that page is performing.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2010/01/take-care-with-ga-direct-traffic-and-bounce-rate-accuracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking Visitor Engagement with GA.</title>
		<link>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2009/11/tracking-visitor-engagement-with-ga/</link>
		<comments>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2009/11/tracking-visitor-engagement-with-ga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest Google Analytics update has one new feature that is extremely useful for information sites &#8211; Engagement Goals. For charity and nfp sites I have found that the traditional url based goals do not give a clear feedback if users find the site useful. The new goals, which are very easy to implement, are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Google Analytics New Goals Features" href="http://analytics.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-analytics-now-more-powerful.html" target="_blank">The latest Google Analytics update </a>has one new feature that is extremely useful for information sites &#8211; Engagement Goals. For charity and nfp sites I have found that the traditional url based goals do not give a clear feedback if users find the site useful. The new goals, which are very easy to implement, are well <a title="Justin explains new GA Goals" href="http://www.epikone.com/blog/" target="_blank">explained here by Justin</a>. Putting in an initial set of  Goals covering aspects of site engagement such as Time on Site and Page Views shows over time, by keyword, etc how interesting and useful visitors find your site. Before entering Goals it is useful to check the site average for the two main metrics and then take advantage of the `less than` feature in Goals. So for example if the average number of page views is  4.76 per visit you could set  the first Page View Goal at 3 and identify those who are below average. Note that while Goal names and parameters can be changed the data relating to the original goal will remain. So when you set up the Goal initially and specify a threshold of say 3 pages and later decide to up that to 5 pages viewed to achieve the Goal then the Goals achieved will be based on 3 pages for dates prior to the change.</p>
<div id="attachment_349" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 290px"><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Goals.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-349 " style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Google Analytics Goals" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Goals-280x300.jpg" alt="Google Analytics Goals layout" width="280" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google Analytics Goals layout (click for larger image)</p></div>
<p>Sadly you can only include Event Tracking in Goals by using the `_track Pageview function`. This is for most users too complicated to implement &#8211; you have to involve the web dev or IT guys and we all know how busy those guys are. If you can track events eg downloads, sign-ups, feed subscriptions, phone call requests, etc then you have two great sets of Goals that you can measure progress with. By Source, Keywords, etc you can see first how Engagement is improving and then how visitors are acting on that engagement.</p>
<div id="attachment_356" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/GoalLayout.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-356  " style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Goals achieved by Traffic Medium" src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/GoalLayout-300x93.jpg" alt="Goals achieved by Traffic Medium" width="400" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Goals achieved by Traffic Medium (click for larger image)</p></div>
<p>Remember that Goals are cumulative so that on the extreme right (above) the Goal Conversion Rate is the sum of all Goals achieved. If, as here, you have Goals of 2, 4 and 6 Pages Viewed then a Visitor who Views 6 pages will have achieved 3 Goals.</p>
<p>Implementing the new Goals is really easy and is a great step in understanding user behaviour.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.find50-marketing.co.uk/2009/11/tracking-visitor-engagement-with-ga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
